Food Choices for Healthy People and a Healthy Planet

All posts in Food to Avoid



deforestation

You probably knew that rainforests are in deep trouble, and that our food choices are part of the problem. Palm oil is a major culprit, since in countries like Malaysia and Indonesia, forests are being cut down to make room for palm oil plantations. Not only the forests, but creatures that live in them are endangered, including orangutans and rhinos.

Not to mention that the palm oil mill pollutes twice as much water as every unit of palm oil produced..

World Wildlife Fund, in its current newsletter, points out “To make noodles “instant,” manufacturers flash-fry them in palm oil to evenly dry the strands—a process that links instant noodles to environmental damage because the production of palm oil is one of the leading drivers of deforestation.”  One more reason to let go of processed foods as much as you possibly can!

There are two eco-labels that might help. WWF supports them, while RAN thinks they’re insufficient. Anyway, here they are. Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO.org) began in 2001 when World Wildlife Fund proposed it, and was formally launched in 2003, based in Switzerland.  It’s a pretty complicated consortium of organizations from many countries that sign an agreement to support sustainability in the palm oil supply chain.

Green Palm is a subsidiary of a British oil importer and manufacturer. It has an interesting plan. Enterprises that produce certified sustainable palm oil can register their product with Green Palm. Then it seems they can sell their certificates. Is this like carbon cap and trade credits? Go here and see what you think.

Of course, by reading labels you can also avoid palm oil altogether. This may not be easy, since the stuff is everywhere. According to the Rainforest Action Network it can be found in “ice cream, cookies, crackers, chocolate products, cereals, breakfast bars, cake mixes, doughnuts, potato chips, instant noodles, frozen sweets and meals, baby formula, margarine, and dry and canned soups.” Go here for more info.

Related links:
The Problem with Palm Oil
Norway Cuts Palm Oil Consumption 64% in One Year
How to Stop Buying Palm Oil and Help Save the Orangutans




bromine_water

Did you know that over three thousand (3,000+) non-food substances are legally added to food in the U.S.? Manufacturers can add chemicals that preserve, color, sweeten, and flavor your food, as well as “improve” its texture or other quality deemed desirable by marketing departments. Oh yes, and add artificial vitamins and minerals that processing removed.

We’ve bought this stuff for decades. I shudder to think of the cake mixes I learned to use as a child. And a huge ratio of our food is still processed.

So why are chemicals used in our food banned in other countries? Dyes, brominated vegetable oil (which I wrote about in January), growth hormones given to animals, arsenic, and more, are banned in Europe. See this article from Dr. Mercola.

We’ve reached some kind of dystopia when Russia bans American food, in this case, meat, because of a feed ingredient called ractopamine. Since we export half a billion dollars worth of beef and pork to Russia, this is not a small item. The USDA asked Russia to postpone the requirement, and the New York Times suggested it was retaliation for American actions on Russian human rights violations.

Michale Pollan’s recent book Cooked urges us to prepare our own food. Pollan is a shameless, enthusiastic promoter of meat, speaking and writing cheerily about slaughtering and butchering, but he does have a point: we should be preparing more of our own food. That’s one way to get us out of some dangers posed by industrial food.

PS. Don’t you wonder if the manufacturers eat their own products?

Related links:
Revealed: Shocking list of popular foods and drinks readily available in U.S. grocery stores that are BANNED in other countries because their chemicals are deemed ‘dangerous’
80 percent of US packaged foods may contain dangerous chemicals




burger eater 1078574XSmall

A five-year study of over 73,000 people found that eating meat can shorten your life. To support longevity, the following kinds of diets worked the best, in this order:

  • Pesco-vegetarian (fish is the only animal product eaten)
  • Vegan (no animal products at all)
  • Lacto-ovo-vegetarian (no meat, but includes dairy and eggs)
  • Semi-vegetarian (meat 2 x week or less)
  • Meat regularly included in diet

The study, published last month in the Journal of the American Medical Association (Internal Medicine),  Vegetarian dietary patterns and mortality in Adventist Health Study 2  was conducted on members of Seventh-Day Adventist churches. Considering that the SDA philosophy discourages meat eating, one might assume that even the meat eaters in this study consumed less than average Americans. Yikes! So if researchers had included a group of average American meat eaters, the benefits of omitting meat would probably be even more obvious.

The researchers, led by M.J. Orlich, concluded, “Vegetarian diets are associated with lower all-cause mortality.” So regular meat eaters come in, shall we say, dead last. And from other sources we know that the worst meats are highly processed ones like sausages.

Another study, published earlier this year by S. Tonstad and colleagues in the journal Nutrition, Metabolism, and Cardiovascular Disease,  found that “Vegetarian diets (vegan, lacto-ovo, semi-) were associated with a substantial and independent reduction in diabetes incidence” (Vegetarian diets and incidence of diabetes in the Adventist Health Study-2).

My headline is strongly worded – obviously there are exceptions to this research because so many factors are involved in health and longevity. But if anyone tries to tell you that going vegetarian is riskier than eating meat, you can tell them they just might be dead wrong.

Related links:
Vegetarians live longer, but it’s not because they don’t eat meat
Vegetarians May Live Longer




TFA lg

You may recall that some years ago trans fatty acids (TFAs) were declared a health danger. TFAs are produced by partially hydrogenating vegetable oils until they are in a semi-solid state (like lard or butter). This makes them convenient from a manufacturing standpoint, but dangerous from a human one. They were so clearly linked to heart and metabolic risks that a major study of them was halted before completion so the researchers could warn the public. Labels began to require notification of TFA percentages in 2006.

Well, what’s happened in recent years? Researchers at Harvard School of Public Health, working with the Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI), have examined commonly available manufactured foods, comparing 270 products in 2007 and again in 2011. They found mixed results. Good news: some manufacturers have reformulated two thirds of their products to reduce (or even eliminate) TFAs. Hmm, seems to me that this is another example of “the sky did not fall” when regulations based on good science are enforced. Bad news: some manufacturers have not, and even those who began going the right direction have slowed their efforts. Result: TFAs can still be found in hundreds of products.

“Artificial trans fat wreaks havoc on Americans’ metabolism and blood chemistry, something the FDA has known for 15 years,” said CSPI executive director Michael F. Jacobson. “This study clearly indicates that some food companies simply can’t be relied upon to get rid of trans fat on their own. The FDA could solve this problem once and for all, and save thousands of lives, with the stroke of a pen.”

How to protect yourself? You can’t be expected to read this whole study, even though it lists all 270 products the authors studied. The table of results is pretty complicated. What you can do: Read labels! Anything with trans fat should be avoided completely. Unfortunately, “Products that contain less than half a gram of trans fat per serving may list zero grams on Nutrition Facts labels,” said one of the study’s co-authors Dr. Fadar Otite. Let me add that the phrase “partially hydrogenated vegetable oil” is a euphemism for TFAs and any product containing it should be avoided as well. Here’s one more reason to choose organic whenever possible.




Salt_shaker

“Stomach share” is probably not a phrase you’re familiar with – but it’s the holy grail of industrial food makers. It means how much of YOUR stomach they can fill with THEIR products.

Walter Willett, a nutrition expert from Harvard whom I’ve admired for years, calls it “the transition of food to being an industrial product.” That’s right, we’re being sold industrial products to put in our mouths.

According to Michael Moss, whose new book Salt Sugar Fat is justifiably causing a sensation, one industry insider, who must be credited with some awakening consciousness about industrial food’s role in obesity, said at a secret top-level executive meeting, “We have to make a sincere effort to be part of the solution.” (location 179 of 7341). But another company CEO retorted with hostility and the others kept their mouths shut. Thus ended an opportunity 1999 for the food makers to reform themselves.

sugar cubes lg

Moss began his quest after a 2009 peanut salmonella factory killed 8 people and sickened 19,000 in 43 states and a tainted meat shipment paralyzed a dance teacher and sickened hundreds. He was stonewalled – not by the meat industry but by the USDA, which refused to release basic information. After detective work – for which we must all be grateful – Moss found that slaughterhouses protected themselves from scrutiny by requiring big industrial hamburger makers to delay safety testing until these slaughterhouses’ products had been stirred together with the products of other slaughterhouses, thus effectively destroying information about what police call the “chain of custody.” (location 271)

These are just a few of the jaw-dropping discoveries Moss made. If you know anyone who eats manufactured food, do them a favor and give them this book.

Personally, I would like to know what these industry executives eat at their business lunches – and what they feed their children.




Salt_shaker

“Stomach share” is probably not a phrase you’re familiar with – but it’s the holy grail of industrial food makers. It means how much of YOUR stomach they can fill with THEIR products.

Walter Willett, a nutrition expert from Harvard whom I’ve admired for years, calls it “the transition of food to being an industrial product.” That’s right, we’re being sold industrial products to put in our mouths.

According to Michael Moss, whose new book Salt Sugar Fat is justifiably causing a sensation, one industry insider, who must be credited with some awakening consciousness about industrial food’s role in obesity, said at a secret top-level executive meeting, “We have to make a sincere effort to be part of the solution.” (location 179 of 7341). But another company CEO retorted with hostility and the others kept their mouths shut. Thus ended an opportunity 1999 for the food makers to reform themselves.

sugar cubes lg

Moss began his quest after a 2009 peanut salmonella factory killed 8 people and sickened 19,000 in 43 states and a tainted meat shipment paralyzed a dance teacher and sickened hundreds. He was stonewalled – not by the meat industry but by the USDA, which refused to release basic information. After detective work – for which we must all be grateful – Moss found that slaughterhouses protected themselves from scrutiny by requiring big industrial hamburger makers to delay safety testing until these slaughterhouses’ products had been stirred together with the products of other slaughterhouses, thus effectively destroying information about what police call the “chain of custody.” (location 271)

These are just a few of the jaw-dropping discoveries Moss made. If you know anyone who eats manufactured food, do them a favor and give them this book.

Personally, I would like to know what these industry executives eat at their business lunches – and what they feed their children.