Food Choices for Healthy People and a Healthy Planet

All posts in Food



Salt_shaker

“Stomach share” is probably not a phrase you’re familiar with – but it’s the holy grail of industrial food makers. It means how much of YOUR stomach they can fill with THEIR products.

Walter Willett, a nutrition expert from Harvard whom I’ve admired for years, calls it “the transition of food to being an industrial product.” That’s right, we’re being sold industrial products to put in our mouths.

According to Michael Moss, whose new book Salt Sugar Fat is justifiably causing a sensation, one industry insider, who must be credited with some awakening consciousness about industrial food’s role in obesity, said at a secret top-level executive meeting, “We have to make a sincere effort to be part of the solution.” (location 179 of 7341). But another company CEO retorted with hostility and the others kept their mouths shut. Thus ended an opportunity 1999 for the food makers to reform themselves.

sugar cubes lg

Moss began his quest after a 2009 peanut salmonella factory killed 8 people and sickened 19,000 in 43 states and a tainted meat shipment paralyzed a dance teacher and sickened hundreds. He was stonewalled – not by the meat industry but by the USDA, which refused to release basic information. After detective work – for which we must all be grateful – Moss found that slaughterhouses protected themselves from scrutiny by requiring big industrial hamburger makers to delay safety testing until these slaughterhouses’ products had been stirred together with the products of other slaughterhouses, thus effectively destroying information about what police call the “chain of custody.” (location 271)

These are just a few of the jaw-dropping discoveries Moss made. If you know anyone who eats manufactured food, do them a favor and give them this book.

Personally, I would like to know what these industry executives eat at their business lunches – and what they feed their children.




Salt_shaker

“Stomach share” is probably not a phrase you’re familiar with – but it’s the holy grail of industrial food makers. It means how much of YOUR stomach they can fill with THEIR products.

Walter Willett, a nutrition expert from Harvard whom I’ve admired for years, calls it “the transition of food to being an industrial product.” That’s right, we’re being sold industrial products to put in our mouths.

According to Michael Moss, whose new book Salt Sugar Fat is justifiably causing a sensation, one industry insider, who must be credited with some awakening consciousness about industrial food’s role in obesity, said at a secret top-level executive meeting, “We have to make a sincere effort to be part of the solution.” (location 179 of 7341). But another company CEO retorted with hostility and the others kept their mouths shut. Thus ended an opportunity 1999 for the food makers to reform themselves.

sugar cubes lg

Moss began his quest after a 2009 peanut salmonella factory killed 8 people and sickened 19,000 in 43 states and a tainted meat shipment paralyzed a dance teacher and sickened hundreds. He was stonewalled – not by the meat industry but by the USDA, which refused to release basic information. After detective work – for which we must all be grateful – Moss found that slaughterhouses protected themselves from scrutiny by requiring big industrial hamburger makers to delay safety testing until these slaughterhouses’ products had been stirred together with the products of other slaughterhouses, thus effectively destroying information about what police call the “chain of custody.” (location 271)

These are just a few of the jaw-dropping discoveries Moss made. If you know anyone who eats manufactured food, do them a favor and give them this book.

Personally, I would like to know what these industry executives eat at their business lunches – and what they feed their children.




sqrlcone lg

Nature gives us some foods that come in their own packaging – apples, walnuts, bananas, coconuts. You can probably think of some more. Humans have also created some edible packaging, most memorably the ice cream cone. Filmy cling wrap made out of vegetables has been in development for years (I wrote about it in 2002 and again in this space last year), though I haven’t seen any in the market yet.

In another twist, edible plants are being turned into packaging to cushion electronics for shipping.  Let’s just hope we don’t reverse that trend and start eating iphones….

A neat website called fastcoexist.com, a goldmine of interesting ideas, highlighted a coffee cup that is a cookie you can eat after you’ve finished your beverage. It’s not in production yet, but go here for a photo.

OR you could make your own edible cup. An unnamed culinary genius turned muffin tins over, draped bread or cookie dough over the protruding bulge, and voila! Remove from your oven a set of concave cookies, all ready to be filled with ice cream or quiche or whatever is your personal indulgence. See a neat photo here. 




sqrlcone lg

Nature gives us some foods that come in their own packaging – apples, walnuts, bananas, coconuts. You can probably think of some more. Humans have also created some edible packaging, most memorably the ice cream cone. Filmy cling wrap made out of vegetables has been in development for years (I wrote about it in 2002 and again in this space last year), though I haven’t seen any in the market yet.

In another twist, edible plants are being turned into packaging to cushion electronics for shipping.  Let’s just hope we don’t reverse that trend and start eating iphones….

A neat website called fastcoexist.com, a goldmine of interesting ideas, highlighted a coffee cup that is a cookie you can eat after you’ve finished your beverage. It’s not in production yet, but go here for a photo.

OR you could make your own edible cup. An unnamed culinary genius turned muffin tins over, draped bread or cookie dough over the protruding bulge, and voila! Remove from your oven a set of concave cookies, all ready to be filled with ice cream or quiche or whatever is your personal indulgence. See a neat photo here. 




bycatch lg

Overfishing means taking more individuals of a species than is sustainable – there aren’t enough left to produce future generations. Bycatch means catching sea creatures you don’t even want, but they die anyway, choked in nets, dead or dying on trawler decks, or dumped back into the ocean.

“The Tragedy of the Commons” is a famous essay from 1968, in which Garrett Hardin pointed out that if each person acts only in his or her own self-interest with common goods such as public land, eventually the common good is used up. Destroyed. This is what has happened with fishing. Each fisher, or more likely trawling corporation, grabs as much as possible, heedless that they are killing the goose that lays the golden eggs.

BUT far-sighted scientists, agencies, non-profits (especially Environmental Defense Fund) and some fishers themselves have been working for years to balance present needs with future ones. I’ve written about this before. More good news came out last month, when the European Union’s parliament voted overwhelmingly to restore fish stocks in the next 7 years. That’s restore, not merely slow down the overfishing. Restore, with a date to end overfishing and rewards for fishers who work more sustainably.

“An overwhelming number of members of the European Parliament from all political groups made history today, by voting to reverse decades of overfishing by the EU and by setting ambitious targets for the restoration of fish stocks,” said Uta Bellion of The Pew Charitable Trusts in a press release.

What you can do: Eat less seafood, or if you do, make sure it’s sustainably procured.  Support your elected and appointed representatives who stand behind environmental regulations.  And remember to heave a sigh of relief and gratitude when steps in the right direction are made.




burger eater 1078574XSmall

Dining out can be a restful break from routine, but it can also be an unfortunate opportunity to indulge in salty, fatty foods (even at sit-down and fine dining establishments). Apart from what they serve, we should think about how much. A dozen years ago, when I first began writing about food, health, and the environment, I wrote:

“We eat too much. In the 1990s, Americans consumed several hundred more calories a day than we did in the 1950s. Restaurant portion sizes have increased, in some cases by 100%. More restaurants are serving gigantic portions. One restaurant in Texas offers a meal of a 72-ounce steak (yes, four and a half pounds) plus shrimp cocktail, potato, salad, and bread.”

The obesity epidemic has many causes (such as government policies that make junk food cheaper than healthy food), as I’ve written in a professional health journal, but surely sheer quantity of food consumed is one of them. Restaurant portions have been part of the problem, especially in fast food places, because big chains can “supersize” a meal and charge much more for the upgrade than the actual ingredients cost. I think the habit of big portions just percolated through the industry, even to good restaurants. When is the last time you dined out and were able to eat everything on your plate? I thought so.

Could there be a change coming? New York Times reporter Stephanie Strom has found numerous chain restaurants are now offering lighter, healthier fare. Not just lettuce salad, either; they’re reworking some of their standard offerings – and giving smaller servings.

I think this is a good idea. Unless you bring your own doggie bag, taking food home from a restaurant uses packaging (paper, foil, plastic, or all three). Not earth-friendly!

So next time you go to your favorite restaurant, consider praising the staff for offering smaller servings – or ask for them.