Food Choices for Healthy People and a Healthy Planet

All posts in Food Politics



bromine_water

Did you know that over three thousand (3,000+) non-food substances are legally added to food in the U.S.? Manufacturers can add chemicals that preserve, color, sweeten, and flavor your food, as well as “improve” its texture or other quality deemed desirable by marketing departments. Oh yes, and add artificial vitamins and minerals that processing removed.

We’ve bought this stuff for decades. I shudder to think of the cake mixes I learned to use as a child. And a huge ratio of our food is still processed.

So why are chemicals used in our food banned in other countries? Dyes, brominated vegetable oil (which I wrote about in January), growth hormones given to animals, arsenic, and more, are banned in Europe. See this article from Dr. Mercola.

We’ve reached some kind of dystopia when Russia bans American food, in this case, meat, because of a feed ingredient called ractopamine. Since we export half a billion dollars worth of beef and pork to Russia, this is not a small item. The USDA asked Russia to postpone the requirement, and the New York Times suggested it was retaliation for American actions on Russian human rights violations.

Michale Pollan’s recent book Cooked urges us to prepare our own food. Pollan is a shameless, enthusiastic promoter of meat, speaking and writing cheerily about slaughtering and butchering, but he does have a point: we should be preparing more of our own food. That’s one way to get us out of some dangers posed by industrial food.

PS. Don’t you wonder if the manufacturers eat their own products?

Related links:
Revealed: Shocking list of popular foods and drinks readily available in U.S. grocery stores that are BANNED in other countries because their chemicals are deemed ‘dangerous’
80 percent of US packaged foods may contain dangerous chemicals




Recently, 2 million people in 436 cities in 52 countries (according to organizers)  marched in public protests to show their opposition to the global seed and pesticide corporation Monsanto and everything it stands for. That would include: its development of GMO (genetically modified organisms) food crops, its intimidation of farmers who won’t go along, its history as developer or producer of things like DDT, agent orange, bovine growth hormone, aspartame, nuclear weapons, PCBs, its participation in the “revolving door” in Washington, where industry leaders become regulators or elected officials are given cushy industry jobs after they leave office. Not surprisingly, Monsanto is hugely profitable. According to its 2012 annual report, in the most recent year its net sales amounted to over $13 billion, with a B, 14% more than the previous year..

With the profits goes power. Industry has defeated almost every effort to require labeling of GMO foods (including last year’s Proposition 37 in California). The times may be changing. Connecticut this week actually passed a law requiring GMO labeling, though it’s a conditional one.

Some people don’t agree that there’s a problem. A heated debate recently occurred in the website Motley Fool, which is a commercial financial advice site. The original article, aptly titled “Why is Monsanto the Most Hated Company in the World?”, questioned the validity of claims on both sides, but concluded by saying,

“It seems that GMOs will inevitably become a larger part of our food supply, because the corporate motivator in the United States has proved to be stronger than the citizen motivator in recent years. A few protests won’t change that. It will take concerted, long-running national efforts to change diets and attitudes before Monsanto and its peers are forced to loosen their grip on American farmlands.”

The comments are as revealing as the article – check them out.

Related links:
Ocean Robbins — Call to Action for a Food Revolution
Monsanto gives up fight for GM plants in Europe
Monsanto’s Latest Sneaky Endeavor: Patent Common European Crops




Salt_shaker

“Stomach share” is probably not a phrase you’re familiar with – but it’s the holy grail of industrial food makers. It means how much of YOUR stomach they can fill with THEIR products.

Walter Willett, a nutrition expert from Harvard whom I’ve admired for years, calls it “the transition of food to being an industrial product.” That’s right, we’re being sold industrial products to put in our mouths.

According to Michael Moss, whose new book Salt Sugar Fat is justifiably causing a sensation, one industry insider, who must be credited with some awakening consciousness about industrial food’s role in obesity, said at a secret top-level executive meeting, “We have to make a sincere effort to be part of the solution.” (location 179 of 7341). But another company CEO retorted with hostility and the others kept their mouths shut. Thus ended an opportunity 1999 for the food makers to reform themselves.

sugar cubes lg

Moss began his quest after a 2009 peanut salmonella factory killed 8 people and sickened 19,000 in 43 states and a tainted meat shipment paralyzed a dance teacher and sickened hundreds. He was stonewalled – not by the meat industry but by the USDA, which refused to release basic information. After detective work – for which we must all be grateful – Moss found that slaughterhouses protected themselves from scrutiny by requiring big industrial hamburger makers to delay safety testing until these slaughterhouses’ products had been stirred together with the products of other slaughterhouses, thus effectively destroying information about what police call the “chain of custody.” (location 271)

These are just a few of the jaw-dropping discoveries Moss made. If you know anyone who eats manufactured food, do them a favor and give them this book.

Personally, I would like to know what these industry executives eat at their business lunches – and what they feed their children.




Salt_shaker

“Stomach share” is probably not a phrase you’re familiar with – but it’s the holy grail of industrial food makers. It means how much of YOUR stomach they can fill with THEIR products.

Walter Willett, a nutrition expert from Harvard whom I’ve admired for years, calls it “the transition of food to being an industrial product.” That’s right, we’re being sold industrial products to put in our mouths.

According to Michael Moss, whose new book Salt Sugar Fat is justifiably causing a sensation, one industry insider, who must be credited with some awakening consciousness about industrial food’s role in obesity, said at a secret top-level executive meeting, “We have to make a sincere effort to be part of the solution.” (location 179 of 7341). But another company CEO retorted with hostility and the others kept their mouths shut. Thus ended an opportunity 1999 for the food makers to reform themselves.

sugar cubes lg

Moss began his quest after a 2009 peanut salmonella factory killed 8 people and sickened 19,000 in 43 states and a tainted meat shipment paralyzed a dance teacher and sickened hundreds. He was stonewalled – not by the meat industry but by the USDA, which refused to release basic information. After detective work – for which we must all be grateful – Moss found that slaughterhouses protected themselves from scrutiny by requiring big industrial hamburger makers to delay safety testing until these slaughterhouses’ products had been stirred together with the products of other slaughterhouses, thus effectively destroying information about what police call the “chain of custody.” (location 271)

These are just a few of the jaw-dropping discoveries Moss made. If you know anyone who eats manufactured food, do them a favor and give them this book.

Personally, I would like to know what these industry executives eat at their business lunches – and what they feed their children.




dietitians for prof integrity

Uh oh, food politics again. Here is more proof that we, individual citizens, need to become our own food safeguards. We knew that the FDA and USDA are heavily influenced by meat, dairy, and grain lobbies (and that’s putting it politely), but it’s sad to learn that organizations that we thought were on our side may not be so innocent.

My friend Michele Simon, who runs the watchdog organization Eat Drink Politics, has found that the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics is way too friendly with major food industries. According to her report, the Academy accepts money from ConAgra (which makes ReddiWip cream in a can, the heavily salted Marie Callender’s products, etc), the National Cattlemen’s Beef Association (which sued Oprah Winfrey for daring to say she wouldn’t eat another hamburger), Kellogg’s, Mars, and the National Dairy Council.

If you’re a dietitian or nutritionist, you can get continuing education credits by taking a course from Coca Cola (where you will learn that sugar is not a threat to children), Kraft (which makes a cereal that is 55% sugar), Nestle, and others.

Maybe we should not be surprised, then, that the Academy has not yet endorsed important public health measures, such as taxing sodas and labeling genetically modified foods.

But as always, there’s good news just around the corner. Disgusted by this unhealthy partnership, a group of dietitians has recently formed Dietitians for Professional Integrity.

I’m happy to report that, according to food activist Ocean Robbins, over 500 dietitians joined the group – within two days of its launch.




dietitians for prof integrity

Uh oh, food politics again. Here is more proof that we, individual citizens, need to become our own food safeguards. We knew that the FDA and USDA are heavily influenced by meat, dairy, and grain lobbies (and that’s putting it politely), but it’s sad to learn that organizations that we thought were on our side may not be so innocent.

My friend Michele Simon, who runs the watchdog organization Eat Drink Politics, has found that the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics is way too friendly with major food industries. According to her report, the Academy accepts money from ConAgra (which makes ReddiWip cream in a can, the heavily salted Marie Callender’s products, etc), the National Cattlemen’s Beef Association (which sued Oprah Winfrey for daring to say she wouldn’t eat another hamburger), Kellogg’s, Mars, and the National Dairy Council.

If you’re a dietitian or nutritionist, you can get continuing education credits by taking a course from Coca Cola (where you will learn that sugar is not a threat to children), Kraft (which makes a cereal that is 55% sugar), Nestle, and others.

Maybe we should not be surprised, then, that the Academy has not yet endorsed important public health measures, such as taxing sodas and labeling genetically modified foods.

But as always, there’s good news just around the corner. Disgusted by this unhealthy partnership, a group of dietitians has recently formed Dietitians for Professional Integrity.

I’m happy to report that, according to food activist Ocean Robbins, over 500 dietitians joined the group – within two days of its launch.